Read this article in order to get better soon.
Select one of the three issues (one that you have not looked at in much detail yet).
Choose TWO texts: one WRITTEN PERSUASIVE text and one VISUAL TEXT and compare the two in the following task.
In a coherently constructed piece of prose, analyse how the use of argument and language in both the written and visual texts are used to attempt to position readers in particular ways. 600-700 words
You are effectively creating your own sample SAC in the style of the paper on Canvas.
TO SEE A SAMPLE PAPER:
1. Log in to Canvas (via internet: mhs.instructure.com)
2. Go to course modules section. There should be a blue banner – choose ‘Analysing and Presenting Arguments from the list.
2. Download ‘Sample Outcome 2 Task Paper’ – this is what the exam will look like.
Consider the following and ensure that you have thought about each and taken these elements into account
- Time and place: when is this action occurring; between whom?
- Setting: a sense of place for backdrop purposes; for symbolic purposes; for atmosphere and dramatic purposes
- Themes: which of these ideas are you exploring: class; power; ownership; spirituality; secrecy; wealth; family; identity; self-worth; grief; conflict; anger; guilt; bitterness etc….(it’s a long list – hone in on one or two to really explore in detail)
- Premise: exactly why and in what circumstances is the interaction occurring? How believable is it given all that occurs in the text?
- Characters: how are your characters portrayed – their relationships with others/the land, their views and values; their identity; their inner conflicts; are they haunted by memories?; do they wonder about the future?; what do they hope for?; what do they fear?
- Whose “lived experience” are you hoping to shine a light on?
- Keep it within the realm of possibility – you should be complementing Grenville’s text, not contradicting it.
- SHOW, DON’T TELL. You will need to think about what you want to hint at and how you can show the reader enough for them to infer what you are talking about.
- Opening needs to be strong and engaging and can open ‘in media res’ – in the middle of the action – or can begin with description of setting or people which sets a mood or atmosphere
- Consider how you build tension by hinting at discord, increasing the intensity subtly and ensuring that your reader is drawn into the conflict (could even be a person’s inner conflict)
- Consider how you could use PATHOS to create a sense of pity and sympathy for a character and their position in the story
- Exercise restraint – you don’t need to write about a punch-on. The threatened action need not even occur. Your writing will be more powerful for the tension rather than the action your try to write.
- KILL YOUR DARLINGS. Don’t use 12 words where one will do.
- Mix up your sentence structures to control the pace and mood of your writing.
- Sentence fragments. Use them.
- Try for immediacy – don’t lapse into the passive voice. Keep things active (attributing actions to specific people)
- Dialogue needs to capture accents, class, education, culture. It should reflect the cadence of speech (often not fully formed sentences and including trailing off….. Or interrup–I mean, interjections)
- Punctuate your sentences appropriately – particularly dialogue.
- Intersperse dialogue with description. A classic mistake is to open with some scene setting and never ever describe (show) anything again. That would be the equivalent of switching off the visual feed while watching a movie and only allowing your audience to hear the sound. Alarming, to say the least.
- Vocabulary: do your research. Use the terminology appropriate to the time and place and characters.
- Be specific with the details – give your writing authenticity.
- Appeal to the senses. Sights, sounds, smells, tastes, textures – these are all things that evoke a response from your reader.
- Use the symbols or motifs Grenville has provided you with or introduce new ones: roof tile; fire; telescope; book; boat; river; cliffs; oysters; singing; clothing
USE YOUR EAR FOR POETRY (AND PROSE!)
- Read your work aloud. No, really. Fix any errors that may have crept into your expression (subject/verb agreement; tense control)
- Listen out for any parts that sound overly wordy or recount-like. Kill your darlings.
- Read your work to a critical friend. Get some feedback. Listen to their questions and examine their responses.
IF IN DOUBT
Ask WWKGD? (what would Kate Grenville do?)
The answer, my friend, is not blowin’ in the wind, nor is it secret. It’s right there in The Secret River.
And remember: drafting is a process.
Your response must refer closely to the text and draw on appropriate features of the text. You may develop any of the writing tasks we have started in class or you may choose from the following options:
1. Sal speaking to a grandchild about her understanding and experiences of aboriginal culture. Be sure to use Sal’s voice, for example her vocabulary, her way of speaking, reflecting her personality. Also create the premise for the conversation and capture Sal’s thoughts and feelings as she looks back and remembers.
2. Write a journal from the point of view of one of Thornhill’s descendants. The descendant is wealthy pastoralist/farmer who comes across the stone with the fish carving when he rips up the floorboards of the family home at ‘Thornhill’s Place’. This prompts the farmer to research the origins of his family’s acquisition of the land and the conflict associated with it.
3. Create the narrative and dialogue between Dick and Blackwood discussing why Dick left home.
4. Write a letter from the perspective of one of the main or secondary characters set in the time of the events of the novel which explores the massacre on Blackwood’s property. This letter was never sent and has only just been discovered buried amongst the floorboards of his or her home.
6. Create a play for ‘voices’ (between four to six voices with each voice belonging to the characters from the novel – the settlers and Aborigines). Create the monologues for each voice and think about how they will be presented on stage and where one character’s monologue will be interjected by another character’s monologue and so on. Do not simply have the characters take turns in delivering and finishing their monologues independently of each other; do not have the characters interacting with each other; only the monologues must interact with each other.
7. Create a letter (to whom?) or a journal written from Blackwood’s point of view, reflecting on the way the British settlers responded to conflict with the Aborigines and how his own views changed over time.
8. Retell a section of the novel from another character’s point of view (e.g. Smasher, Blackwood, Dick, Sal, Long Jack, Sagitty, Mrs Herring).
9. Imagine you are going to direct either a film version or a play version of The Secret River. Select three to four key scenes where characters encounter different types of conflict. Create a director’s brief or report describing how the conflict should be dramatized. You are to include suggestions about the setting, action, body language, dialogue and the use of sound, music and lighting.
10. Write a series of diary entries by a member of Captain McCullum’s expedition, describing his experiences of encountering conflict with the Aborigines.
Monday 22 May: Draft completed in double period (electronic)
Monday 29 May: Submit final (electronic)
There will be two components to the end of semester exam:
1. Comparative argument analysis (based on two or more texts at least one of these is will be a visual.
2.Presentation of an argument (a response to one of the three issues studied in the weeks leading up to the assessment)
Week beginning 22 May: three weeks prior to the exam (scheduled for 13 June), teachers will provide students with three common issues decided upon by the year level teachers.
Students are allowed to research material for the persuasive arguments.
Classwork will obviously involve practice argument and language analyses and points of view tasks set from these three issues.
The exam: ONE of the three issues will be set for the exam.
Only the print and visual texts will be on the exam paper. Additional material to support Part B will not be provided as students have had the three week lead up time to be conversant with the issues.
Since I am away:
Students should complete the following work from their red textbook ‘Analysing and
Presenting an Argument’
Read and complete the following tasks:
3.14, 3.16, 3.17, 3.19 (David Morrison’s speech)
p.37 VERBAL ATTACKS AND RIDICULE
3.2, 3.21, 3.22
Bring both red book and The Secret River to class on Monday.